Bing Maps – Draggable Routes and New Navigation – Welcome to June 2007

Microsoft finally has added draggable routes to their Bing Maps service. ‘Bout time guys since Google has had it for over 2 years. That said I’ve been using Bing Maps more lately because I don’t trust the Google Maps layers (great API, horrible data).

Is anyone going to host a Bing Maps Party?

This entry was posted in GIS and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

7 Comments

  1. yodel
    Posted November 10, 2009 at 7:40 pm | Permalink

    You can’t blame me for this one… The newer data was partly me though ;)

    Although I hate to see anyone else lose their job I sure hope the dolt responsible for that heinous M$ video got the boot last week.

  2. Posted November 26, 2009 at 8:16 pm | Permalink

    Horrible data? What? What’s so bad about it?

    You know, the Report A Problem feature works pretty well. Read about my experience here: http://www.stevevance.net/planning/2009/11/google-maps-the-dynamic-gis-system/

  3. Andrew
    Posted December 1, 2009 at 2:01 pm | Permalink

    At PDC 2009 one of the Microsoft Bing Map reps told me the AJAX API for Bing Maps would also soon include this feature for programmers to use the draggable routes as right now this feature is only on the consumer website at Bing.com/maps. So that’s great news for developers!

  4. Posted December 8, 2009 at 2:46 am | Permalink

    i am using both Bing and Google and i think both search engines give relevant search results. i would still prefer Google though, because it gives a little bit more relevant search results than Bing.

  5. Posted December 29, 2009 at 11:07 pm | Permalink

    BING search engine is just as good as Google. In my own personal experience, Google does give more releveant search result than Bing but the difference is very small. **

  6. Posted January 9, 2010 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    i am a user of Microsofts BING search engine and it is as good as google search. for searching blogs, i think google gives more relevant search results compared bing.

  7. Posted February 4, 2010 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    i think that Bing is not as good as Google. Google would still index new websites faster than Bing. Microsoft would still need a lot of catching to do with GoogleBot.

2 Trackbacks

  1. [...] Microsoft’s Bing Maps has a host of new features in their latest update.  New functions include draggable routes, command parsing for functions such as driving directions and traffic information, the ability to embed maps into personal web sites and better web site navigation features.  The Bing home page was also streamlined so it will load faster. (Via James Fee) [...]

  2. [...] I felt prompted to write this post because James Fee on his blog often (1st) writes (2nd) about the (low) quality of the data Google puts in its [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Note: This post is over 2 months old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

Subscribe without commenting

  • License

  • Disclaimer

    The information in this weblog is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

    This weblog does not represent the thoughts, intentions, plans or strategies of my employer. It is solely my opinion and probably incorrect.

  • Meta