James Fee GIS Blog

Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services

James Fee GIS Blog header image 2

The OSGeo Store

March 5th, 2007 · 22 Comments · OSGeo

Lost in all the big celebration of the One Year Anniversary of the Open Source Geospatial Foundation I noticed that there is an OSGeo Store. Now you too can look smart wearing all that wonderful OSGeo clothing and even magnets! And for that special person in your life:

Update - At the risk of offending people at large on the internet, I’ve decided to remove the image above and toss it to the trash. *sigh*



Tags:

22 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Sean Gillies // Mar 5, 2007 at 1:00 pm

    That’s frightening, but not as frightening as http://pythong.org.

  • 2 James Fee // Mar 5, 2007 at 1:05 pm

    Ah yes, a classic….

    Sends me into convulsions…

  • 3 KoS // Mar 5, 2007 at 1:20 pm

    Which reminds me…..type in http://www.planetg.com

    Did this by accident last night. What a mug. :)

    KoS

  • 4 Brian Timoney // Mar 5, 2007 at 2:45 pm

    Call me old fashioned, but I for one am in no hurry to label the private parts of loved ones as “open source.”

    BT

  • 5 anon // Mar 6, 2007 at 1:25 pm

    Are you kidding me? You removed the thong because people were offended?

  • 6 James Fee // Mar 6, 2007 at 1:26 pm

    Actually OSGeo was offended. They asked nicely so I complied decided to remove it. There was no demand that I do anything, just that I think about the affect on the foundation. That is all I’m going to say about it.

  • 7 Lefty // Mar 6, 2007 at 1:37 pm

    Let me get this strait…

    OSGeo emailed you saying they were offended by the graphic? OK, this has made my day, the funniest thing I’ve heard all week.

  • 8 Kirkland // Mar 6, 2007 at 1:50 pm

    ROTFLMAO

    Someone needs to post the thong on their blog

  • 9 Not Huey Long // Mar 6, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    Wow, what a bunch of prudes. They should be thanking you for the publicity instead of worrying about trivial issues.

  • 10 OSGeo Police // Mar 6, 2007 at 2:06 pm

    We also demand that all GIS users get down on their knees and kiss our feet, thanking us for bringing GIS to the masses.

  • 11 anon // Mar 6, 2007 at 2:08 pm

    I’ve sat in on their little meeting on IRC. This doesn’t surprise me at all. They are so tied up in their grandiose ideas about what OSGeo should be that they have no sense of reality.

    It was only a matter of time before they made fools out of themselves.

  • 12 ManifoldUser // Mar 6, 2007 at 2:11 pm

    Looks like someone posted the thong on another site.

    http://gispro.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/osgeo-demands-removal-of-the-osgeo-themed-thong/

    Whenever companies try and do this it always backfires. At the rate James posts, it would have been off the front page in less than a week, now it will appear everywhere.

  • 13 Helen Lovejoy // Mar 6, 2007 at 2:16 pm

    Will someone please think of the children?

  • 14 New to open source // Mar 6, 2007 at 2:22 pm

    Actually the thong got me to start thinking about open source for the first time….

  • 15 Alan Smithee // Mar 6, 2007 at 2:45 pm

    Right. Because the brown bag and all of the crossed out text are so much better publicity for the cause. Apparently they don’t read James enough to know how he’d comply. Come down from the ivory tower guys. It was a joke.

  • 16 Tyler Mitchell // Mar 6, 2007 at 2:49 pm

    Hi all,
    Sorry for the misunderstanding, but no one demanded anything. James was just being kind when I (Tyler) expressed concern. The thong was actually removed from our store early on because some members were offended by the idea. So to have a graphic that implies we actually sell those was misleading, that was all.

  • 17 Larry Renolds // Mar 6, 2007 at 2:55 pm

    Has open source GIS jumped the shark when they are worried about thongs?

  • 18 David Davis // Mar 6, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    Maybe we should order them a bib?

    http://www.cafepress.com/osgeo.71360159

  • 19 skidmark // Mar 6, 2007 at 5:19 pm

    now, if you put a brown spot on the bottom I could understand all the fuss…..

  • 20 KoS // Mar 6, 2007 at 7:56 pm

    Sounds to me, if Tyle is correct. All James had to do was add a disclaimer or footnote when he posted the image. That way, there isn’t anything misleading. :)

    Bring back the thong!! Now I have the thong song in my head…….

    KoS

  • 21 James Fee // Mar 7, 2007 at 2:26 pm

    James felt that if the image offended people, it should be removed.

    James is also envious of those whose life is so easy that they can get offended by such images.

  • 22 Jason Birch // Mar 7, 2007 at 10:55 pm

    Wow.

    Let’s make this clear. OSGeo wasn’t offended. Someone speaking on behalf of OSGeo (right or wrong) was.

    For me (speaking on behalf of myself, rather than OSGeo, because I haven’t polled the membership) I am disappointed that this happened.

    As an organisation that is founded on the principle of freedom, it is disconcerting to see any sentiment that curtails freedom of expression, as James was clearly exercising in his post.

    Personally, I found it funny. I actually thought that we still had the thong in our store, and am sorry to hear that it had been removed. If we can’t make fun of ourselves, we deserve a reputation for being full of ourselves.

    That said, I don’t agree with anon’s comment about grandiose vs. reality. A majority of the membership is working hard towards some very achievable goals. And we can always use some more help.

    Jason

Leave a Comment

Note: This post is over a year old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.