Since I’ve decided to break Hangouts with James Fee into Spring and Fall “seasons”1 the summer has been left to swimming and vacations. But with Fall around the corner 2 it’s time to get serious about scheduling the next batch of hangouts. I asked for feedback from people last season and it was a great help. For the fall though I’d love to interview people who haven’t been on the show before or are not as well-known. If you can email me with suggestions (heck include yourself if you want) I’d really appreciate it. My favorite Hangout from last spring was with Lyzi Diamond and I’d love to have more like that.
— Brian Timoney (@briantimoney) August 19, 2015
I hadn’t really thought of the article in that context, I was just looking at a quick way to turn a CSV into a GeoJSON file quickly. But let’s look at Brian’s point, is desktop GIS heavy?
I’ve maintained since Esri abandoned ArcInfo Workstation in the early 2000s, GIS has become difficult to use. Not in the sense that any idiot1 can click the next button, but the simple fact they have no idea what they’re doing. To accomplish this, Esri spent tons of R&D to make GIS as simple as drag a couple of layers to a dialog and just click next until you have an output. You don’t even need to understand the setting, they default pretty much out of the box. Setting fuzzy tolerance? Not a problem, it’s labeled as optional. The need to understand why you are performing analysis is not needed.
Now that isn’t to say Esri is doing something bad. They’re simplifying something that was very scientific and required understanding of FORTRAN or UNIX into something that almost anyone can do. I think at some level they should be commended for making GIS easier and not limited to a bunch of weirdos with Sun SPARCstation 20 workstations. But in doing so they turned something lightweight into something of a beast. Thus Brian’s heavy comment.
But that’s not the end to the story, at least from an Esri perspective. Esri at the same time they were throwing wizards in from of every tool in ArcGIS Desktop, created one of the most powerful GIS libraries ever created, ArcPy. It’s everything we wanted ArcInfo Workstation to become, a modern, no proprietary scripting language with tons of GIS analysis tools. But for some reason Esri doesn’t highlight it as they should. Just go to Esri.com and search for ArcPy. Typical Esri results, it’s a mess. Brian is reading this now nodding, “GIS is heavy”.
Heavy GIS is starting up ArcMap, starting up ArcCatalog, dragging and dropping into a wizard and fighting through the next screens. The process is similar in QGIS which seems to be adopting some of the same wizard dialogs as ArcGIS. They’re heavy because that’s what they need to be. Scott Morehouse years ago told me ArcGIS was complicated because it is “scientific software”. At the time I laughed but I do get it. It’s the long tail of long tails in GIS, solving GIS analysis in so many edge cases that it gets bloated.
Esri should3 have section of their website devoted to Python scripting. Showing how much easier (and faster) it is to do your analysis with ArcPy over ArcGIS Toolbox4. There are pieces all over their website about Python and ArcGIS, but “Scripting” section. That would go a long way to making Desktop GIS not heavy. Searching Google for “Esri Scripting” gives you a dead end to ArcScripts. That should change.
This hilarious article on abandoned Universities in Second Life got me thinking about 3D worlds and GIS.
Colleges were among those that bought the hype of the Linden Lab-developed virtual world. Many universities set up their own private islands to engage students; some even held classes within Second Life.
Most of these virtual universities are gone –– it costs almost $300 per month to host your own island –– but it turns out a handful remain as ghost towns. I decided to travel through several of the campuses, to see what’s happening in Second Life college-world in 2015
I mean seriously, what the heck were we thinking with Second Life? But while Second Life was more hype than function, KML and Google Earth was our great hope. KML export, Arc2Earth, SketchUp all were tools that were used liberally to export our GIS models to Google Earth in hopes we’d finally have a universal GIS viewer. My site is littered with KML export articles that we all thought would change our lives. But honestly none of them really have taken off. In fact I rarely create KML anymore, my clients just doesn’t use Google Earth anymore.
So where is Minecraft in all of this? Safe Software has an Minecraft conversation as part of FME. If I look at the analytics to this site, most of the top 10 search terms have some tie in to Minecraft. But it feels so much different from Second Life or even Google Earth. I honestly have put some thought into licensing FME and putting up a GIS to Minecraft conversion service due to the interest in it.
But are we exporting GIS to Minecraft for visualization? No but I think there is a different thing going on here. Minecraft is as consumer as we get. GIS is very enterprise and business focused. We’ve always wondered how do we get ordinary people to use GIS data1. What Minecraft does is bring all that analysis, data conversion, transformation and scripting into the mainstream. I can’t recall my son ever being so interested in anything as he is in Minecraft. I’m sure your kids are the same way.
I’m still not really sure if Minecraft GIS is has any more traction than Second Life or KML for GIS professionals. It could very well be that in 3 years I’ll look back on this post and laugh at my words. But I’m betting that Microsoft will make Minecraft bigger than it’s ever been and Minecraft export format will be built into every GIS package.
well other than to find a Starbucks↩
I had some endpoints of a lines that I needed to convert to GeoJSON today. Before I started I do what every GIS professional does, take inventory of the multitude of ways to actually accomplish this. I mentally jotted down the following:
- Esri ArcGIS
- Online tools (csv -> json)
I started to realize that these are all pretty heavy tools to just accomplish something as simple as a line string to line. We literally pull out a chainsaw when all we want it to trim a little piece of paper. Nothing simple about converting some coordinates into JSON. Enter Turf.js.
I posted this a while back on twitter but someone asked me about it this morning and I thought I’d share it here on the blog. The Visual Studio Blog has and article out on Why write Python in Visual Studio? which is worth reading for everyone writing Python on Windows.
Recently, Visual Studio 2015 was released with support for Python. Python Tools for Visual Studio (PTVS) are available to help throughout Visual Studio in all the places you’d expect, from editing and IntelliSense, to debugging, profiling, and publishing to Azure. You can find all the details and some video walkthroughs, documentation, and other resources on visualstudio.com, and the post announcing Python Tools 2.1 and Python Tools 2.2 beta.
The post is a great read into the choices the Visual Studio team made on how to integrate IntelliSense with Python. Honestly when VS 2015 came out I’ve started using it for all Python development on Windows and when I switch over to my Mac I really miss the features. GIS users have embraced Python and having a real IDE to help them is a huge plus. In the past I’ve avoided IDEs where I didn’t need them but with Python projects getting larger and more important, it really makes sense to organize them better.
The sale was a milestone for Israel’s young but huge startup community: The first Israeli consumer-app company to be bought for over $1 billion. In an instant, the whole “Startup Nation” decided to quit aiming for fast exits and build billion-dollar companies instead.
When Google bought Waze we were all amazed they paid $1B. Not so much in that we didn’t think Waze was going to sell for $1B1 but that Google needed them. In the end it was simple for Waze:
What made Google pretty attractive for us that No. 1, the company stayed in Israel. No. 2, we remained with our mission, to help drivers avoid traffic jams.
Well and that $1B was pretty attractive too. I’m honestly not sure what is going to happen to Waze moving forward. I still use it daily on my commute. Waze is partnering with cities to improve traffic results and I know millions of others rely on it for better traffic results than Google Maps or Apple Maps. But that’s the kicker right? Questions that come to mind to me are:
- What’s the incentive to innovate beyond improving traffic results?
- What’s the status of the maps behind the application, are they being updated?
- Does Google plan to shut Waze down and “integrate” traffic into Google Maps?
- Is Waze just another example of supporting a proprietary map only to see it be pulled away from the community?
Google bought Waze over 2 years ago. We haven’t seen anything new from Waze beyond these “partnering” programs2. I’ll continue to use Waze for my commuting because it is such a time save but the end game of Waze is probably not benefiting me.
So DigitalGlobe has an API in beta. Funny thing is when I first went to the page I saw this popup for the “first 100 customers”:
Get DigitalGlobe Maps API now for the introductory price of $1 per 1,000 views
I guess they don’t have 100 customers yet. But let’s get beyond the question if it’s even relevant that DG has an API and look at their offering:
They’ve got two versions of their imagery API. One that is global and has high frequency updates and one that is color balanced but only regional1. But what we really want to see is the API, right? Well look at the splash page:
This is why we created a mapping API just for you: easily access our compelling high-resolution imagery of the earth along with fantastic stylized basemap content from Mapbox. We want you to use our imagery in your apps, no matter if you’re an industry giant or a promising startup. We believe our imagery is the standard upon which all others are measured, and we want you to benefit from our expertise.
Remember this partnership from 3 years ago? Don’t be so surprised to see Mapbox there. The plans have been put into motion to see Mapbox integrated with many other vendors but here we have DigitalGlobe’s API built on top of Mapbox. I’m not sure if DG’s API will be popular but at least we know it’s a robust, easy to use and powerful API.
What’s the most interesting part of all this is Esri is not to be found. DG and Esri have had a long time relationship but I think DG has realized that deals with Esri only benefit Esri. Best of luck to DG and Mapbox!
and probably not updated often↩