I’ve been getting more and more .NET developers talking to me about my MapGuide Open Source move over the holiday. Seems like many ArcIMS developers are downloading and checking out MapGuide, trying to get away from the ArcGIS Server/Desktop conflict (they have to develop on 9.1, but their IT department wants to roll out 9.2). I’ve said this before, but every day I get more and more ESRI developers asking me for directions on how augment their toolbox with open source. Personally I’m beginning to see the power behind hit and the .NET integration is welcome. After my initial battle with PHP, I’m running very well and at least on this laptop MapGuide Open Source and AJAX Tile viewer. It seems to run faster than ArcIMS 9.2 and the Web ADF on my laptop, but I’ll be honest that isn’t a scientific observation.
Geoff Zeiss says that the MapGuide User Reception he attended was very interesting:
The most remarkable thing in my mind was that this meeting was unlike any other event of a similar type that I have attended at AU (Autodesk University) in the past, and I think the reason was that the focus was on open source, specifically MapGuide Open Source.
I think the move to open source MapGuide has been a great one, not only for Autodesk, but their users. The kicker here is how open source will direct the future of MapGuide and how that differs greatly from the traditional closed model that seems to be driven more by large clients (see PUG) and less by the small users like ourselves. This whole “Request for Comment” process is wonderful because you don’t need to know Jack Dangermond personally to get a say in the future development of products that directly affect your career. There are small companies doing great things with MapGuide Open Source so anyone can be successful at open source web mapping.
MapGuide Open Source just reinforces the idea that the future of web based applications will be based around the open source model that companies such as Autodesk have jumped on. Being at the front of this wave will benefit not only Autodesk, but the community that is built around MapGuide itself. Exciting times indeed Geoff!
8 responses so far ↓
1
ezreeuser
// Nov 28, 2006 at 10:09 am
Is this an ESRI blog or not?
2
critter
// Nov 28, 2006 at 10:18 am
You should have gone to AU given it is a short flight from Phoenix.
3
James Fee
// Nov 28, 2006 at 10:20 am
Yea, I should have looked into it. Oh well….
4 hablandodesigs » Blog Archive » Nueva versión de MapGuide Open Source // Nov 29, 2006 at 12:36 am
[...] via All Points Blog, James Fee Blog [...]
5 Slashgeo // Mar 5, 2007 at 4:04 pm
MapGuide Open Source and Community Participation…
Between the Poles discuss Autodesk University’s presentation on MapGuide OpenSource and community decision making. From the entry: ” Most interesting to me is the number of new FDO Data Providers, being developed by the community, including PostGIS, …
6
floyd domino
// Jan 19, 2008 at 9:48 pm
why anyone in their right mind would use .net is a huge mystery
if this is the direction of MGOS they are shooting themselves in the foot and everywhere else
there is absolutely NOTHING open about .net
this is the wrong way to go, folks
wrong, wrong wrong
7
James Fee
// Jan 20, 2008 at 9:13 am
Are you kidding me? What the heck does .NET being open have to do with MGOS being successful. By your “logic” any company that uses .NET cannot take advantage of MGOS. They should just stick with proprietary solutions.
Give me a break, .NET is part of the real world and any open source project that takes advantage of it will be successful.
8
Akram
// Jul 9, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Yes , really MapGuide Open Source is a big increment in GIS field
Leave a Comment