Comments on: Mapdex Search Task for ArcGIS Explorer http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2005/12/28/mapdex-search-task-for-arcgis-explorer/ Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:41:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: James Fee http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2005/12/28/mapdex-search-task-for-arcgis-explorer/#comment-839 James Fee Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:31:28 +0000 http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=460#comment-839 <p>From what I've heard, ArcGIS Explorer isn't really part of the ArcGIS "platform" so I assume that means it won't interfear with an existing ArcGIS install.</p> From what I’ve heard, ArcGIS Explorer isn’t really part of the ArcGIS “platform” so I assume that means it won’t interfear with an existing ArcGIS install.

]]> By: Brian Flood http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2005/12/28/mapdex-search-task-for-arcgis-explorer/#comment-838 Brian Flood Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:27:56 +0000 http://zhun.pair.com/spatiall/blog/?p=460#comment-838 <p>yea, this would be a cool feature. I'm really interested in seeing just how flexible the AGE customization framework will be. Originally, I had heard you would be able to build both tasks and map tools, each of which would need signifcant access to the underlying clientside API if they were to be useful. However, I then read on David M. blog that we should be thinking more about the server side when programming AGE. Maybe I read that comment wrong but I hope they are not restricting what can be done on the client side. Whatever it turns out to be, I'm sure Jeremy and Asif can get a task based on their REST api in there.</p> <p>Also, I'm assuming the "slim" version of ArcObjects they are using is a completely different build then the current ArcGIS stuff. I hope there will be no version conflicts (e.g. you need version 9.1 if you want AGE and ArcGIS installed side by side)</p> <p>ps - I can't believe Rutgers almost beat ASU...</p> yea, this would be a cool feature. I’m really interested in seeing just how flexible the AGE customization framework will be. Originally, I had heard you would be able to build both tasks and map tools, each of which would need signifcant access to the underlying clientside API if they were to be useful. However, I then read on David M. blog that we should be thinking more about the server side when programming AGE. Maybe I read that comment wrong but I hope they are not restricting what can be done on the client side. Whatever it turns out to be, I’m sure Jeremy and Asif can get a task based on their REST api in there.

Also, I’m assuming the “slim” version of ArcObjects they are using is a completely different build then the current ArcGIS stuff. I hope there will be no version conflicts (e.g. you need version 9.1 if you want AGE and ArcGIS installed side by side)

ps – I can’t believe Rutgers almost beat ASU…

]]>