James Fee GIS Blog

Geospatial Technology, Web Mapping and Spatial Services

James Fee GIS Blog header image 2

Email Shapefiles or Geodatabases? Nah, Give Me e00!

June 29th, 2005 · 5 Comments · ESRI

I’ve grown to really dislike emailing datasets to people.  Shapefiles have always been a pain as you either have to attach at least 3 files to an email or "zip" it up to ensure that the files are readable on the other end.  The Geodatabase did better as it was one file containing one or more datasets, but alas these days emailing a Microsoft Access file is just about worthless as most email systems (and even Outlook to an extent) strip out anything with a *.mdb extension.  Yea, one could always use FTP or some other web based system, but email is still the easiest and quickest way to send files.

One format that was never difficult to send (though half the time people didn’t know what to do with it) was the ESRI Export Interchange file (what we mostly now call e00).  This single ASCII file was almost always accepted with email systems and could store many different dataset types.  Why is it we always take a couple steps back as we move forward.  I just can’t stand having to change a Geodatabase extension to *.txt or something else just to get an email system to accept it, or remind people that the need to at least include the *.shx and *.dbf with that shapefile they sent.  I’d love to see a new interchange format from ESRI, or just update the existing Export Interchange format to handle the newer data types the ESRI is supporting.  In retrospect, using a Microsoft Access file format probably wasn’t the best idea for many reasons, but if we had an up to date interchange format, that wouldn’t matter at all.



Tags:

5 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Howard Butler // Jun 29, 2005 at 8:27 pm

    I have found that the SDEX format is pretty reasonable to use if everyone is working with SDE. People I work with often request e00 files to get around email nastiness as well. It’s all rather frustrating.

  • 2 Christophe // Jun 30, 2005 at 3:03 am

    The new (9.0) GDB XML should be the good solution : portable, open, intelligent as the GDB it self, that’s the E00 of the 21st century !

  • 3 GeoMullah // Jul 7, 2005 at 6:05 pm

    What about GeoPDF? Compact GIS functionality through one of the most widely distributed programs on Earth… And from what I’ve heard, the other GIS vendors are looking at it as a primary file format.

  • 4 James // Jul 7, 2005 at 6:46 pm

    I’d love GeoPDF, but I don’t see that on ESRI’s horizon. Actually that is a good question to ask at the ESRI User Conference later this month.

  • 5 Michael Bufkin // Nov 29, 2005 at 10:25 am

    James,

    I noticed a reference to GeoPDF in this post. We have made pretty good progress in establishing it as a standard in DoD and are working hard in municipalities and utilities. I would be interested in your thoughts on the concept.

Leave a Comment

Note: This post is over 3 years old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.